Tea Parties and Terabytes : the Digital Library Revolution
A few months ago on Publib , I entertained the idea of replacing a brick and mortar library with electronic book readers and subscriptions.
Our local free library had spent about $8,000,000 on a library renovation / reconstruction employing grants, local taxes, donations and state funds. Notably, it had started out being about a 4 million dollar project. What would 8 million dollars along with yearly operating funds purchase now? Could the needs of library users be met with electronic book readers and subscriptions? Could accessibility be expanded?
Asking those questions met with sharp disapproval from the librarian in Rhode Island who had overseen the project. She characterized me as a tea bagger – (derogatory slang meaning Tea Party member) for daring to bring up the idea. At least I think that was what she meant. The Urban Dictionary has some other definitions that are not very nice.
Why would entertaining a simple idea of how 8 million dollars could have been spent create such a visceral reaction? Public libraries represent the most efficient aspect of local government. Hardly any library system is a beneficiary of public largess. The entire loosely affiliated public library system in the United States is efficient because of internalized ethics, highly trained personnel and sharing. Sharing resources means everyone benefits. Sharing is something other public services have never done as well as public libraries. Are public libraries in such precarious shape that civil discourse threatens libraries as the bastions of civil discourse? Is time running out? Are we too late?
Imagine no brick and mortar library exists. What sort of digital book access could an initial 8 million dollar investment and a yearly operating budget of $480,000 afford? …
$8,000,000 could buy:
A $480,000 operating budget could purchase:
Lots of electronic books. The cost of many titles through Amazon’s Kindle program is $9.99 or less. So, yearly new ebook accession could be greater than or equal to 48,000 titles. That seems like a fairly small collection to support sixty thousand ebook readers.
The 60,000 ebook readers could also be shared within households. With 2.59 people on average per household – 155,400 people would be sharing only 48,000 titles. That is less than 1/3 of a book simultaneously available to all readers at once during the first year.
But wait, there’s more, terabytes more:
Amazon also provides Kindle Popular Classics with almost instantaneous free access to over 15,000 books.
Project Gutenberg provides Free eBooks with over 33,000 titles.
The Internet Archive provides free access to massive collections .
The United States Government along with State and Local Governments are providing more and more public information in digital format.
So, what does that mean?
60,000 households could each have immediately access to hundreds of thousands of free books and articles and increasing access to new books and articles.
But what about catalogs and reader services? Doesn’t everyone need catalog help? These collections are HUGE!
The Library of Congress is the largest library in the United States. The Library of Congress Catalog is massive and serves as the expert resource for copyright. The Librarians who staff the Library of Congress are some of the most highly compensated in the US.
Which catalog is intuitively better?
Library of Congress Catalog search:
Here is the output in basic search for the word balliot: http://bit.ly/fCXAnh
Select item 2 – CONVAL Report: http://bit.ly/ijNORk
Using the same search strategy in Google Books:
Here is the output in basic search for the word balliot: http://bit.ly/faHnAT
Select item 1 – CONVAL Report: http://bit.ly/gUPu1v
It is even intuitively easier to search within Library of Congress collections using Google Books full text. LC requires a copy submitted to them when they formally copyright.
Full- text of the Copyright Catalog available within Google and not within the LC catalog: http://bit.ly/gzJf7S provides reference pointers to LC’s collection.
The HELIN Library Catalog employs III encore software and includes: Brown University, Bryant University, Community College of Rhode Island, Dominican House of Studies, Hospital Libraries of Rhode Island, Johnson & Wales University, Providence College, Rhode Island College, Roger Williams University, Salve Regina University, University of Rhode Island, and Wheaton College holdings.
Which catalog is more helpful?
Encore tells us that we should use other words and check our spelling. It offers no leads to additional material. Amazon provided the book, the electronic version, reviews, shots of inside pages and related works. Some library catalogs intergrate similar features in the user interface, but they are not leading the way. They are merely following the examples of successful for-profit library catalogs that only recently began to market books.
The Digital Library Revolution
“But I don’t want to go among mad people,” Alice remarked.
“Oh, you can’t help that,” said the Cat: “we’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad.”
“How do you know I’m mad?” said Alice.
“You must be,” said the Cat, “or you wouldn’t have come here.” ~ Lewis Carroll
Please join us on BestofPublib Facebook
The Publib Archives
Filed under: Administration, Architecture, Buildings & Grounds, Circulation, Contracting out, current topics, Departments, Ethics, Finance, Grants, History of Libraries, HVAC, Interiors, Library Marketing, Library Organization, Library Profession, Multimedia, On-line, Outreach, Public Services, Research | Tagged: Amazon, e-book, e-books, ebook, ebook readers, eBooks, encore, Google, III, Kindle, Kindle Direct Publishing, LC, Library of Congress, Nook, Sony | 10 Comments »